Three steps. Consumption and price gap come from you. The percentages are fixed assumptions, based on the sources below.
1. Energy a simple forecast gets wrong
annual consumption × 4% error of a simple forecast
4% is the average day-ahead error of a simple forecast that repeats last week, for Germany as a whole. A single site or a small portfolio is harder to forecast, which would raise this figure. If you already have a good forecast, your current error is lower and so is the saving. At 500 GWh, 4% is 20 GWh a year bought or sold at short notice.
2. What it costs you
energy a simple forecast gets wrong × your extra cost per MWh
The extra cost is what you pay on top of the day-ahead price when you fix a miss at short notice. It depends on your market and contract, so you set it yourself. We start at €15/MWh as an illustration. For scale, the German day-ahead price averaged €89/MWh in 2025.
3. What better forecasts save
cost of errors × 25 to 40% less
At the grid operator Albwerk, forecast errors fell by about 40% against the previous provider. That is a drop in error, not in cost, and cost does not fall one-to-one with error. A manufacturer in Italy saved about 28% of its balancing costs. We use 25% (cautious, our own assumption) to 40% (optimistic) as the range.
Annual savings = step 3. The expected value is the midpoint of the cautious and optimistic case.
Simplifications: errors in both directions are treated alike, every megawatt hour of error costs the same, and the cost falls in proportion to the cost of errors you start from.